MOREAU, SOPHIA “What Is Discrimination?” Philosophy & Public Affairs 38, no. 2 2010:143-179

文献 ※ ■はモレーによる分類(太字は重要文献と思われるもの)

 

■ 反差別法を集団間の分配的正義の手段とする議論

Owen FissGroups and the Equal Protection Clause,Philosophy & Public Affairs 5 (1976): 107-77.

Robert Post,Prejudicial Appearances: The Logic of American Anti Discrimination Law,California Law Review 88 (2000): 1-40.

 

■ 私的な団体の責任

John GardnerLiberals and Unlawful Discrimination,Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1989): 1-22;

・同上“Discrimination as Injustice,Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 16 (1996): 353-67.

Denise Reaume,Harm and Fault in Discrimination Law: The Transition from Intentional to Adverse Effect Discrimination,Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2 (2001): 349-85.

 

■ 配慮要求について

Christine Jolls,Accommodation Mandates,Stanford Law Review 53 (2000): 223-306;

・同上、“Anti-Discrimination and Accommodation,Harvard Law Review 115 (2001): 642-99;

Samuel R. Bagenstos, “‘Rational Discrimination, Accommodation and the Politics of (Disability) Civil Rights,Virginia Law Review 89 (2003): 825-923

Sharon Rabin-Margalioth,Anti-Discrimination, Accommodation and Universal Mandates? Aren't They All the Same?Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 24 (2003): 111-52.

 

■ 差別の不法性について

Amnon Reichman,Professional Status and the Freedom to Contract: Toward a Common Law Duty of Non-Discrimination,Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 14 (2001): 79-132;

 

■ 被害者を排除しようとする欲求によって動機づけられているケースはより悪い。

Larry Alexander,What Makes Wrongful Discrimination Wrong?University of Pennsylvania Law Review 149 (1992): 141-219;

Richard Primus,Equal Protection and Disparate Impact: Round Three,Harvard Law Review 117 (2003): 493-587.

Matt Cavanagh, Against Equality of Opportunity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)

 

■ expressive dimension 

Deborah Hellman, When Is Discrimination Wrong? (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2008)

・―――― The Expressive Dimension of Equal Protection,Minnesota Law Review 85 (2000): 1-70

Elizabeth Anderson and Richard H. Pildes,Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement,University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (2000): 1503-75

 (Anderson & Pildes 2000 は、福嶋敏明「法・政府行為の表現的次元とその問題性に関する一考察――アメリカ合衆国における「法の表現理論」をめぐる議論状況」『早稲田法学会誌』第54巻、2004年に紹介・検討あり)